<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>djchuang.com - Latest Comments in blog comments search engine</title><link>http://djchuang.disqus.com/</link><description>strategist / networker / ideator / unconventional</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:32:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: blog comments search engine</title><link>http://www.djchuang.com/2008/blog-comments-search-engine/#comment-10906204</link><description>A tends to be bleak, with most individuals dying from the disease within a year after diagnosis. However, there are some who will live a decade or more with this deadly form of cancer. Why the discrepancy in prognosis? As with most cancers, the earlier it is detected, the better the outcome.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There may be hope for those suffering from mesothelioma though. A diagnosis does not mean death. Many new drugs are being used to help treat the disease and may improve the mesothelioma prognosis greatly. Mesothelioma prognosis, has the most up to date, important information surrounding Mesothelioma, Mesothelioma doctors and symptoms, Mesothelioma treatment, and Mesothelioma tests and research and it is your resource for Mesothelioma attorneys and lawyers, asbestos cancer, asbestos exposure, asbestos removal, asbestos lawsuits, and asbestos attorneys.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.med5.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.med5.net&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mesothelioma Prognosis Info</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:32:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: blog comments search engine</title><link>http://www.djchuang.com/2008/blog-comments-search-engine/#comment-8212087</link><description>Blog comments are what give spice to the information published.  What a nice reality check to find that some people have alternative opinions.  Sometimes I finish an article at cnn in total agreement with the author, but then run right into a buzz saw of opposition who bring up good arguments against the author.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shad sluiter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:48:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: blog comments search engine</title><link>http://www.djchuang.com/2008/blog-comments-search-engine/#comment-3199903</link><description>Great Post</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mesothelioma Attorney</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:22:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: blog comments search engine</title><link>http://www.djchuang.com/2008/blog-comments-search-engine/#comment-3031358</link><description>&lt;a href="http://churchcrunch.com/2008/10/13/iterend-new-technorati/#comment-33" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://churchcrunch.com/2008/10/13/iterend-new-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">human3rror</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:41:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: blog comments search engine</title><link>http://www.djchuang.com/2008/blog-comments-search-engine/#comment-3031356</link><description>mentioned the "pure" breeds in response to your q.  good stuff, thanks for the pointer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">human3rror</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:41:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: blog comments search engine</title><link>http://www.djchuang.com/2008/blog-comments-search-engine/#comment-2262049</link><description>True: we are now offering search on title, urls, users, tags...... Search on comment text is coming very soon and you will be able to search in the millions of conversations we have.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The issue with the ping is that it is treated asynchronously: this mean that if you get some comments between the ping and when the server actually get the feed, some might be lost. But, this said, it will probably work for most blogs, but will not be 100% reliable.&lt;br&gt;With blog posts it is not too much an issue as the update frequency is lower (except if you post very very frequently ;-) )&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Christophe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">clemoine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:18:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: blog comments search engine</title><link>http://www.djchuang.com/2008/blog-comments-search-engine/#comment-2259788</link><description>@Mike - Thanks for the comment. I do hope to see this genre of comments search engine grow rapidly and soon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@clemoine Thanks for the clarification about coComment. My bad. What I couldn't figure out is how I can search the comments that are indexed for keywords or phrases -- it looks like search by tags is as close as it gets. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Didn't know Comments RSS were limited (and I think Blog Posts RSS are probably limited too). That being the case, would it be as simple as a "ping" from the blog comment feed as needed, e.g. if the limit is 50 comments, a ping every 50 comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djchuang</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:31:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: blog comments search engine</title><link>http://www.djchuang.com/2008/blog-comments-search-engine/#comment-2256934</link><description>Hi,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The issue with comment RSS feeds is that they are limited in size (number of items) and if you have a blog with lots of comment activity, an index server will need to scan the feed very frequently to get all comments: considering the number of sites with commenting, this will endup being an issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please note that coComment does not index only comments from our users: we also get all the comments from the conversations that  our users track + all comments from integrated blogs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">clemoine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:00:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: blog comments search engine</title><link>http://www.djchuang.com/2008/blog-comments-search-engine/#comment-2255121</link><description>What about &lt;a href="http://www.omgili.com?" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.omgili.com?&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles Knight</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:32:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: blog comments search engine</title><link>http://www.djchuang.com/2008/blog-comments-search-engine/#comment-2248586</link><description>Thanks so much for the mention. We're ecstatic as well and we're working hard to make the service better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps when we find some time we should publish some "updated" statistics about the commentosphere.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Montano</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:08:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>