<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>djchuang.com - Latest Comments in hot idea: podcast commercials</title><link>http://djchuang.disqus.com/</link><description>strategist / networker / ideator / unconventional</description><atom:link href="https://djchuang.disqus.com/hot_idea_podcast_commercials/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:47:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: hot idea: podcast commercials</title><link>http://www.djchuang.com/2006/hot-idea-podcast-commercials/#comment-2185190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Technology is democratizing more than ever, and I think the lines between broadcasting and narrowcasting should be blurred. Commercials can be broadcast and narrowcast both at the same time, worth a try, and results are what matters to most (all?) for-profit and non-profit ventures. Best case in point is the Super Bowl commercials.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djchuang</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: hot idea: podcast commercials</title><link>http://www.djchuang.com/2006/hot-idea-podcast-commercials/#comment-2185191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;but aren't you supposed to broadcast your commercials instead of narrrowcast them? I thought the purpose was "spread the word" and not "count the respond"....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bumble</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:52:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>